Welcome and happy reading!

Since, like anyone else, I receive tons of scam emails and snail mail letters, I decided to present here some of these. All of these (and many more which I just delete) are scams. This means, what the senders have in mind is to racket one of us. And according to what I've seen, they do succeed quite often.

If you have similar letters in your mailbox, either disregard or play with the person knowing that you can't give him (or her) any information about:

  1. Your bank account,
  2. Your address — or any valid address if that matter,
  3. Your family, and
  4. any other information that you judge private or even intimate.

Ha! I say "Your"... even if you don't like your neighbor at all, don't give his information either. The Internet leaves tracks (hackers in the US are being caught one after another!) and you would certainly be in even bigger trouble.

In the meantime, I hope you will enjoy reading these letters as I do myself once in a while. 8-)I do not always add comments with the letters since I usually don't have time to do so, but there would often be a lot of joke to tell!

Soap Bubbles

 

Latest Scams
  • Last update: 10/31/2009

    Good one! I'm his Dear Partner and he has to present himself to me in details because I think I actually don't know my Dear Partner...

     
  • Last update: 02/18/2012

    This is scary... Look at the white text in the bill: "Someone has sent you up to $1,500.00!!!". Beside the fact that this is not proper English, but well... It is past so I already received the money, but they do not know how much and if you want you can CLICK HERE to get to the place to get that money that "Someone" (a bank) has sent you already (in your dream, I guess.) Okay good. What am I going to do with $1,500 that I have to pay back? I have a bit more advance on my credit card and my balance is... $0. I think I do not need to work to pay the banks. Well... The ...

     
  • Last update: 10/31/2009
    Received:	from snap.turnwatcher.com by substitute with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server]
    		id <S110B0> for <@mail.m2osw.com:alexis@halk.m2osw.com>
    		from <chenlee060@aim.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:08:50 -0800
    Received:	from aim483.com (p57A20481.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.162.4.129])
    		by snap.turnwatcher.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D72926ADCF
    		for <alexis@m2osw.com>; Thu,  7 Dec 2006 04:13:45 -0800 (PST)
    From:		Mr.
     
  • Last update: 10/31/2009
    Received:		from snap.turnwatcher.com
    			by substitute with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server]
    			id <S7C70> for <@mail.m2osw.com:alexis@halk.m2osw.com>
    			from <bello_usman4455@hotmail.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:21:48 -0700
    Received:		from hotmail.com (bay21-f7.bay21.hotmail.com [65.54.233.96])
    			by snap.turnwatcher.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABB926AD4F
    			for <alexis@m2osw.com>; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
    Received:		from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
    			Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:23:16 -0700
    Message-ID:		<BAY21-F7800BF8C3B11B06416A419
     
  • Last update: 10/31/2009

    Okay, I'll pass on the syntax in that email for now. It is obvious that people writing spam emails do it on purpose to swart tools such as my anti-spam software. Now, this is fine, it gives me a little more fun work to do.

     
  • Last update: 10/31/2009
    X-Apparently-To:	alexis_wilke@yahoo.com via 206.190.38.193; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:24:51 -0700
    X-YahooFilteredBulk:	66.35.250.206
    X-Originating-IP:	[66.35.250.206]
    Return-Path:		<dicta@spray.se>
    Received:		from 66.35.250.206 (EHLO sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) (66.35.250.206)
    			by mta143.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:24:51 -0700
    Received:		from lmfilto03.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.217])
    			by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
    			id 1BeBIg-00080K-4m; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:24:50 -0700
    Received:		from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
    			by lmfilto03.st1.
     
  • Last update: 10/31/2009
    X-Apparently-To:		alexis_wilke@yahoo.com via 206.190.38.200; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 04:01:44 -0700
    X-Originating-IP:		[66.35.250.206]
    Return-Path:			<benjadi_43@tiscali.co.uk>
    Received:			from 66.35.250.206 (EHLO sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) (66.35.250.206)
    				by mta438.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 04:01:43 -0700
    Received:			from mk-smarthost-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.39])
    				by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
    				id 1BmVtZ-0006Ia-M6 for alexis_wilke@users.sourceforge.net; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 04:01:22 -0700
    Received:			from mk-cpfront-4.mail.uk
     
  • Last update: 10/31/2009

    At the start

    First time I see a scam about the holocaust victimes and their bank accounts. Note that the person says he's a member of an organization in Switzerland and then says he's in America... Also I looked for a list of the ICEP members and I could not find any one under the name Roland Z. Bersson (Bresson? neither!) And the subject... the name of the guy. Ha! Good joke.


    Episode II

    I received another copy of this email today... and I noticed one other thing! The following sentence:

     
  • Last update: 10/31/2009
    Received:	from postino174.com
    		by substitute with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server]
    		id <S789C> for <alexis@m2osw.com> from <dickdada@postino.it>;
    		Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:48:22 -0700
    From:		Billy Bangura <dickdada@postino.it>
    To:		alexis@m2osw.com
    Reply-To:	d_dada@postino.it
    Subject:	CONFIDENTIAL!!
    Date:		Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:49:04 +0100
    MIME-Version:	1.0
    Content-Type:	multipart/mixed; boundary="d3c36a18-9c66-4ef3-8bfd-08f629630bec"
    
    Dear sir,
    CONFIDENTIAL
    Compliment of the day!
    With the good reference made of your esteemed personal/office by the chamber
    of commerce here in
     
  • Last update: 10/31/2009

    I must obviously have been talking with this guy on the phone. I mean, you know, who would send me an email saying he talked with me about the 79,000 dollar bills all of $100 but the guy who talked to me on the phone?!